Close enough. |
The semester has come to an end and in
lieu of a discussion of the last work we read for the class (in which Adam is
kind of an ass who regards Eve and the rest of Gods creations for a cold
scientific perspective, which is a comment on the dangers of looking at the
world through a purely scientific perspective) I’d like to reflect on the class
as a whole as this class was my first experience with a significant portion of
Twain’s works. Now, don’t get me wrong, I’ve read the works of Samuel Clemens
before. I read Huck Finn in a previous class and I saw a horrid film adaptation
of the Mysterious Stranger back in high school. However, the breadth of Mark
Twain’s works is a fact of which I was unaware. I now believe Earnest Hemingway’s
assertion that American literature starts with The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is disingenuous at best.
Before taking this class I was unfamiliar with his
non-fiction works like the literary reviews that make me want him to come back
to life and be a film critic, his travel writings that satirize American
viewpoints, and his endless litany of quotes humorous quotes that get me
simultaneously laughing and thinking. I found myself in an odd position in this
class as I have come to like his non-fiction writing better than his fictional
stories. This position is odd because his fiction is what everyone knows. Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn are American legends, Connecticut
Yankee has spawned an entire sub-genre of time travel stories, and Puddin Head Wilson was an attack on the
American perception of race. They are all important and all great works of
literature, so why do I like his non-fiction better. It’s simple; I think Mark
Twain the observer of humanity is much more interesting than Mark Twain the
author.
I know his keen eye is what makes his novels so
great and pervasive but his non-fiction works are more engaging to me because I
feel like I am communicating directly with the author. When I read his literary
criticism of Fenimore Cooper’s work I find myself fascinated by how his mind
works and I feel like I’ve gotten a glimpse of how he sees the world. With his
travel writings I literally get his worldview. His confrontation with the
sublime, when he looked upon the Sphinx, is a moment that sticks with me more
so than anything I read in his stories. His experience getting a shave in a
French barbershop is hilarious to read. The mindset he adopts when discussing
the atrocities committed by the settlers of Australia got my blood boiling
while illuminating the popular mindset of the time. Also, his experience in the
civil war that led to him and his fellow soldiers shooting and killing someone
whom he was never able to identify is a haunting thought.
I find this position odd because I find it difficult
to articulate why I like one over the other in any concrete sense. Both his
non-fiction and fiction writings, mostly, have the same elements. His sense of
humor, penetrating observations, and captivating wit (wit is not the same thing
as humor) are on full display in both lines of work. I just connect more, on an
emotional level, with his non-fiction writing.
Overall, I have enjoyed this class. I learned more
about both Mark Twain and Samuel Clemens than I ever thought possible. The
adventures that the author had throughout his life are astounding,
heartwarming, and gut-wrenching all at once. Twain was a great writer and I can
see his stories being studied for many more years to come.
Made it into Grad School! |
No comments:
Post a Comment